Imagine if you converted all that ocean in WWHD to the water effects that TPHD uses. There are more pixels in a square inch of TPHD's grass texture or Midna's mask fragment then there are in any of the textures in that whole screenshot from WWHD. Notice all the textures and colors, so many of them just solid and unchanging throughout whatever object they're on. Hell its artstyle was partly borne from the need to reduce graphical demand while still looking good. Yes, Wind Waker HD looks great, but like he said, that's not because it's such a demanding game. It's not about what looks better, it's about how demanding the artstyle is. If you think this and this looks equally good on both an technical and aestethical level, then I don't think there's much more to argue here If you think this and this looks equally good on both an technical and aestethical level, then I don't think there's much more to argue here, you're entitled to your opinion and I am to mine, but you're not gonna convince me that these are equally polished up. There are a few games that look better than TP HD, but I never claimed that it was the best looking game on the console, just that it was par for the course, which it is.Īgain, I disagree. physical printing costs) and still made a decent profit on a no-effort job, so I find it funny that you're defending the cost because "you still like the game as much as when you did when you bought it for $60 a decade ago". Hypothetically speaking they could've sold the "remaster" for $10 (ex. You're acting as if the game itself deserves to be included in that price, which it doesn't considering it was made 10 years ago and Nintendo already got their profits from it back then (on two platforms).
#ZELDA TWILIGHT PRINCESS HD TEXTURE PACK HUD FIX UPDATE#
But let's not pretend like Sony or Microsoft wouldn't have gotten a huge backlash had they tried the same, and let's not pretend like a mere texture update and some changes in the amount of quest items you need to collect justify that $50 price tag. If you feel like you got your money's worth, then I'm not telling you you shouldn't have bought it. Sony and Microsoft give respectively 3x and 5x more content for the same price as Nintendo does with their remasters, but because the big N knows WiiU gamers are in a draught of games and will buy anything thrown at them, they don't feel obliged to put any effort into it. What I'm saying is that it isn't fair from a consumer standpoint. Right, and I'm not saying they're wrong, as evidently TPHD is selling pretty well still. Nintendo prices games based on how well they think they'll sell
I'm not really sure what DKC Tropical Freeze has to do with any of this. Six subreddits from this multireddit are randomly shuffled every hour.
You can also read the rules in more depth on our wiki. Putting text into this format will hide spoilers: (/spoiler) becomes Nintendo. Don't put spoilers in post titles at all. Please be considerate when discussing plot details for games new or old. However, please read other subreddits' rules before submitting there. We will try to tell you how you can resubmit, or recommend a more a suitable subreddit. However, we do ban users who make personal attacks or buy/sell/beg. Our moderation policy is not to keep track of every rule infraction, and everything is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
0 kommentar(er)
